User talk:2A02:AB04:2F43:5000:CA3D:DCFF:FE71:E371

Cris Cyborg
I was trying to figure out a way to respond to you. But I finally figured it out. One fight matrix is credible, your points that you earn jump based off of TITLE FIGHTS, regular fights, get normal bonuses. Weili Zhang is surpassed by the people you mentioned, because in her 20+ fight career, She's only been in 6 title fights, and 2 are with the UFC. Holly Holm, has only won ONE title fight, which was against Rousey, Cyborg has been in 14 title fights, while going undefeated for over 13 years, winning 13 of those title fights as well. Nunes has been in 8 title fights in her entire career as well. Fight matrix does everyone's metrics the same. Just like it has Jon Jones listed at the GOAT (which i completely agree with), others may not. Because you don't agree with the listing, does not make it incorrect. Also if you have such an issue with "fight matrix" take it off of Khabib's page as well. It's sited there "Fight Matrix has Khabib listed as the greatest Lightweight fighter of all time."

Also most "sites" are a personal blog. You have someone who personally states their opinion on things, and places it on a form. Because the UFC states their champion is the GOAT, does not make it so. They were also calling Cyborg the GOAT for years, UFC changes their minds on who is what. It's a personal preference. But for well over a decade, Cyborg has been called the Greatest Female fighter of all time.

If we're going based off of stats. Yes Cyborg is by far and ahead the GOAT. As I stated before, She was undefeated for 13+ years, because She finally lost. Does not mean Her accomplishments leave with her.

Oh and JUST FOR YOU, I even sited some more sites, so you can stop being unbiased and a hater of Cyborg, and taking down references pertaining to her.

Have a nice day. Leave the page alone. Jesus.

136.49.166.71 (talk) 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

WP:3RR -Cris Cyborg
Your recent editing history at Cris Cyborg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cassiopeia(talk) 01:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

New message from Cassiopeia
 Cassiopeia(talk) 01:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

New message from Cassiopeia
 Cassiopeia(talk) 01:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)