User talk:2A02:C7C:6510:B700:16:D003:52F2:7FD8

May 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Colney Heath F.C., you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Colney Heath F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — AP 499D25  (talk)  11:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Colney Heath F.C.. — AP 499D25  (talk)  11:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 11:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)