User talk:2A02:C7C:A820:8800:F90A:6CC7:47E1:1B52

Unfair blanket block is NOT the way to deal with a problem!!!!
So yesterday I was told by various admins that basically this blocking is valid and I MUST create an account. I have done nothing wrong and not made any of the so-called "vandalism" on the numerous pages cited, yet I am tried, convicted and punished without any chance to defend myself, and as soon as I dare to "challenge" the power trip of the admins concerned - I then get blocked for a further 24hrs from even pleading my case, which is yet another abuse of admin's power and a boost to their ego.

So I am banned from making any changes for TWO YEARS - yet I personally have done nothing wrong. How can it be right that Yamaguchi先生  bans a whole wave of INNOCENT users and doesnt even have the backbone to answer me and explain personally? Looking at this admin's page - it is clear that they ENJOY this power trip of making people plead to them. If my IP address (as a customer of Sky.com) is an issue, then why not say on the opening home page that ALL customers of Sky.com MUST create an account. If my IP address is SO "bad" and "a risk" as I was advised, then how was it OK for YEARS before ? Why are such a large group of users blocked - why not the individual who actually committed the "vandalism" ??? Radical suggestion - block the perpetrators and not innocent users. If I must create an account then make it compulsory to ALL users and say so on the home page too.

Lastly - I really cannot be bothered to argue anymore with you admins. You treat us mere mortals with disdain and if fairness means nothing - then by all means trot on. A blanket ban on a large wave of innocent people is not the way to deal with this issue. Hammer and nut comes to mind. 2A02:C7C:A820:8800:F90A:6CC7:47E1:1B52 (talk) 01:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * To answer also your question about why we block ranges instead of the original vandals ... well, do you know any good ways to identify them when they don't have accounts? No, I don't either, and with dynamic IP in such wide use, there's no point in even trying. Maybe one day we will be able to read fingerprints through keyboards and use that in user authentication, but do you really want to live in that world? There are users who believe we should require registration ... the Portuguese Wikipedia already does that. I understand their reasoning, but I disagree, since in the years I've been here I've seen that on balance IP editors do benefit the project. For me, rangeblocks like the one you're caught in are the lesser of two evils compared to not letting any IPs edit. Daniel Case (talk) 06:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)