User talk:2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA

Please check sources
The quote is not inaccurate, I've cited multiple sources that say he say this exact thing. Check them if you have doubts. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Your quote is paraphrased as you already admitted in the wiki page for the main trial. Please be careful when quoting people and the actual quote wad televised for people to reference. 2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA (talk) 14:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Was* Typo. 2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Did you really not read the sources?  Check them and then undo your edit. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * There is a televised source via the Law and Crime network that I have looked back on several times to verify. He says what you quote but you do not clarify WHY is says that which I have done now by using your own line from the main wiki page for the trial. 2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA (talk) 14:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * He also said the exact thing I put on the page as he denied a motion for a mistrial. I'm not misquoting here. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Philip, you're phrasing his quote in a way to frame the narrative. You must also put the quote he says after for context for why he is saying it. It is as simple as that. 2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's there too. I'm literally saying what happened. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Now you have phrased it correctly for context, I'm happy with it. 2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what your problem was. It was said and you were saying it wasn't. I've worked tremendously hard on both Newman and the trial's articles and I always source my claims. I wasn't working with an agenda. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I never said you we're. My probelm is that you didn't phrase the quote with context. You need context when quoting someone. Newman didn't just blurt out he found the evidence overwhelming and by inadvertantly suggesting so could frame what he said in a completely different light than adding the frame of context around it. I'm not being an ass, i'm being specific. 2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA (talk) 14:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Why I was frustrated is that that the meaning of the quote is the same without context. Doesn't matter if it was said during a motion for denial. But we can agree to disagree now that I've pleased you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Our sentances mismatch but you or i can work on that a little to clean it up to have it flow better. Other than that i think it works. 2A02:C7C:B01E:7C00:CD67:3851:32D7:70CA (talk) 14:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)