User talk:2A02:C7C:DB33:8300:813C:89F3:6466:1B00

February 2024
Hello, I'm Alon Alush. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alon Alush (talk) 09:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 2024 Kingswood by-election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello (music) 09:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

No consensus needed, maths doesn’t do opinions, it just does facts. If you want INCORRECT INFORMATION to be displayed, be my guest.


 * If there's a dispute you do discuss it on the talk page. Regardles of anything, you do not add your own commentary to the article. Save that for talk pages. Finally, you don't make personal attacks against other users – this is twice by my count you've done it. — Czello (music) 09:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

So, you’re just going to keep incorrect information on the article then? I don’t think there was any personal attack there. Just yes or no will suffice.


 * Discuss here: Talk:2024 Kingswood by-election. — Czello (music) 09:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh, I have, I look forward to your reply. 2A02:C7C:DB33:8300:813C:89F3:6466:1B00 (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * To be clear on the issue here – as I said in my revert I have no comment on the figures themselves, but we do not add our own commentary into the article itself. It's not changing the figures that was the problem, it was the extra sentences you added. — Czello (music) 10:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Fine then. I will in future, if I am lucky enough. But there was no doubt utter ignorance on the part of people not including yourself of course, who refuse to engage in simple maths. 2A02:C7C:DB33:8300:813C:89F3:6466:1B00 (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Again, I explicitly said I wasn't commenting on the maths (which is why I didn't revert that part of your edit). It was the additional commentary added to the article, which is not how we do things. — <i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i> (<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>) 10:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)