User talk:2A02:C7D:4667:3C00:BCDC:1FB8:9A12:4489

Why is a party's own website not a good enough sources? I understand that you wouldn't use it on some cases - i.e., you wouldn't trust it to be neutral - but why wouldn't you trust a party to know the name of its own candidate? This is merely a fact that the Party would have no reason to lie about.

Wikipedia exists to provide accurate information - this source is reliable in this instance since there would be no reason for it to be deliberate inaccuracy and no risk of accidental inaccuracy; when assessing sources, motivations must be considered. Sources may be reliable in some cases and not in others. A blanket decision to never trust a source on anything is a very blunt instrument.