User talk:2A02:C7D:5D99:3D00:6460:2293:47C1:9483

copy within
You did not the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Vespertine, which is acceptable but it must be attributed attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed. S Philbrick  (Talk)  13:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)