User talk:2A02:C7D:6BEF:A700:5480:A957:7D21:9826

Reversion of edits on Retail
I reverted your recent edit on the article, Retail for the following reasons:


 * 1. The edit was added to the lead section - which is a summary of the article. We would not normally add content to the lead unless it was something that had been discussed in the body of the article.
 * 2. All new content should be sourced from a reliable source. Your edit summary claimed that the content was based on personal experience. Your own experience would not be considered a reliable source.
 * 3. The edit was added at the end of a paragraph summarising some historical facts about retail yet the addition was concerned with the present time. Therefore the edit created a paragraph that was unfocussed.
 * 4. The edit appeared to be a complete sentence, yet it did not start with a capital letter, so that the edit introduced grammatical problems with the prose.
 * 5. It is not clear whether the hours worked mentioned in the edit apply to the international scene. A question that might be asked is whether your experience is typical of a specific geographic area, and whether your experience can be generalised to other countries or regions? Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia and editors are expected to make an effort to provide content that is free from geographic bias.

If you are new to Wikipedia, please take the time to read the Manual of Style (WP:MOS) before making further edits. BronHiggs (talk) 23:51, 6 March 2018 (UTC)