User talk:2A02:C7D:7485:3D00:B5F6:3DE3:9E57:9F4F

December 2020
Apologies - I have no desire to engage in an 'Edit War' (as exotic as that sounds!) I've simply been trying to improve a page which contains multiple grammatical and factual errors and dead links. If 'Binkster' would prefer the other version to remain on Wikipedia, I'll just leave it alone. No big deal - but I do think it's a pity that the article can't be improved or enhanced without someone else overriding the edits arbitrarily. Anyway, as I said, please accept my apologies - I'm just an amateur Wikipedia fan with an English degree who enjoys dipping in once in a while. I shall now go and get some fresh air instead! Happy New Year! (PS Any other editing conflicts are unlikely to be down to me, as my IP address changes regularly, and I've never knowingly been involved in an 'Edit War' before. Do I get a campaign medal now that I have? Thought not! Bye!)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Neo-progressive rock; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.