User talk:2A02:C7D:B48D:1200:C50F:C67C:D79B:9ED

December 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Carl Benjamin. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

GeneralizationsAreBad - your reply is as clear as mud.
Merry Christmas "GeneralizationsAreBad" - you blocked me for opposing the dishonest attack on Carl Benjamin, a dishonest attack either written by yourself or by some other person. I am quite happy to restrict my reply to the "Talk" section if that is what you want. By the way what is your actual name? I find talking to someone who calls themselves "GeneralizationsAreBad" rather absurd. My name is Paul Marks and I do not see why you should attack me in this way - attack me for no honest reason. Please refrain from "technobabble" - you are not an AI, you are (or at least are supposed to be) a human being.2A02:C7D:B48D:1200:C50F:C67C:D79B:9ED (talk) 21:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * OK. Here, you were warned for these edits to Carl Benjamin, which - as noted by - did not include a reliable source and instead relied upon original opinions. Our policies require the former and do not allow the latter. We also need to ensure a neutral point of view in our articles. Here, you were warned for this edit to Anna Chennault, which was another unsourced contention. And another warning for additional unsourced edits to Jeremy Bentham. Same thing at Francis Bacon: Unsourced edit, "Citation needed" tag, removal, another request for sources.


 * Besides this, there are additional unconstructive edits. This (on Talk:Paul Joseph Watson) is simply disruptive. This - on Michael Hudson (economist) - is more unsourced opinion that falls afoul of our biographies of living persons policy by calling someone a liar in Wikipedia's voice. And this on Talk:Laura Loomer is both tendentious and contradicts the boatload of cited sources in the article (as noted by BMK). Our talkpages are not forums for off-topic discussions, as with this on Talk:Robert F. Wagner Jr..


 * I hope this clears things up somewhat. GABgab 21:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)