User talk:2A02:C7D:E847:A500:B059:4114:A72F:F813

Images on List of dinosaur genera
I see you've reverted my image change on the List of dinosaur genera page. Judging from the reasoning in your edit summary, it seems like you believe that just because you've managed the images "for years", your own criteria on the diversity of species and positioning of images is the final authority for the page's image styling. That might be interpreted as you believing that you own the page, which is a big no-no. Wikipedia is built on the principle of allowing editors to build upon, change, or even fundamentally rewrite the works of others, and my changes were down in the spirit of that principle.

I apologize if I may sound defensive or rude, but it is not my intention to. I just want to make you aware of the rules. Also, just in case, you don't have to restore my edit. Atlantis536 (talk) 13:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your polite message Atlantis536! You are right that I don't own the page, sorry for coming across that way, I just wanted to give context to my edit. I am open to others changing the page, the Pachycephalosaurus image was not chosen by me for example. Respectfully, I think the changes you made to the species represented in the images was worse than what was there before due to not representing dinosaur diversity as well as before, and also including species which are mostly fantasy due to being based on very fragmentary remains. Sorry if this sounds rude, I don't mean to be! I have seen you have maintained the page for a long time too and I appreciate that! Finally, I think you might have thought the position of the images prior to your last edit was all chosen by me - it wasn't. Someone764 changed the position of some images to apparently random places that was worse than how it was before.


 * Glad all is settled. I actually tried to revert Someone764's positions before you did it, actually. Atlantis536 (talk) 14:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)