User talk:2A02:C7F:14B4:3400:E9D1:E90:2EE6:6265

Reliable sources
Please read through the reliable sources guideline to learn that types of sources that should be used in Wikipedia articles. Schazjmd  (talk)  23:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have and they were not wikis, but regardless at least for Israel I have added two additional completely separate sources that also say he’s the head of the house, and even call him Nasi meaning Prince. 2A02:C7F:14B4:3400:E9D1:E90:2EE6:6265 (talk) 23:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Please note also Civility. Please do not accuse other editors of lying. DrKay (talk) 07:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)


 * You are lying though, you claim that the 3 sources I added are self-published and thus not reliable. Prove they are self published and I’ll stop calling you a liar, but you can’t so I won’t. 2A02:C7F:14B4:3400:E9D1:E90:2EE6:6265 (talk) 11:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please note that by references, we mean sources that meet the requirements of Reliable sources. User-generated websites such as wikis are not reliable sources. DrKay (talk) 07:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Heads of former ruling families shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 07:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:DrKay. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 11:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)


 * There was no personal attacks, I merely asked you to stop lying and vandalising pages. 2A02:C7F:14B4:3400:E9D1:E90:2EE6:6265 (talk) 11:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Heads of former ruling families. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DrKay (talk) 11:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Please note that self-published in wikipedia means user-generated. It does not matter whether or not the actual author is the subject or related to the subject. This is explained at the linked policy page. DrKay (talk) 11:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)


 * User-generated is separate in that page to self-published. Additionally you also claimed it was self-published and not user-generated which is still a lie.
 * Besides, it’s neither self-publish nor user-generated, since the sources are not wikis or social media and can’t be edited by anyone, please stop lying, I have screenshots of what you said. 2A02:C7F:14B4:3400:E9D1:E90:2EE6:6265 (talk) 11:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for incivility, edit-warring, disruptive editing, and persistent addition of material sourced to user-generated websites.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 11:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Not an inappropriate response, I have screenshots proving that DrKay has lied.
 * www.thesanhedrin.net is obviously a wiki. Yosef Dayan is not mentioned anywhere in the other two sources, and so neither supports any of the content of your edit. Therefore the material is only sourced to a user-generated self-published website that is not acceptable as a source for controversial material about a living person.
 * None of my edits is vandalism, as explained above.
 * As explained above and at the Civility page unsupportable accusations of lying and vandalism are uncivil. Instead of apologizing and retracting those personal attacks, you have instead doubled-down on them by repeating them since the block.
 * Per Talk page guidelines and User pages, I am permitted to remove personal attacks from my own user talk page. Indeed, I am permitted to remove any comment from my user talk page that does not fall within one of the exceptions. DrKay (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The Sanhedrin is not a wiki, at least not one that anybody can edit, try yourself. Plus the other two sources most definitely name Yosef Dayan, claiming they don’t is another lie. I also found other sources which I will be adding once the block expires. You’ve been caught out for lying, just admit it. 2A02:C7F:14B4:3400:E9D1:E90:2EE6:6265 (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Proof of lying
https://imgur.com/a/vPZXreo

As you can see here DrKay has been caught out lying, they claimed that every time they accused my sources of being “self-published” they actually meant “user-generated” but claimed they are two terms for the same thing. This shows how quickly, easily and willing they are to lie.

Regardless if any semantics you might accuse me of however, the sources are not user generated, so it’s seems the “self-published” was originally a lie to get around that, but after I asked for proof it’s self-published suddenly they actually meant user-generated so they don’t have to provide the proof.

But let me ask… where’s the proof those websites are usergendrated, especially the two additional sources I later added. 2A02:C7F:14B4:3400:E9D1:E90:2EE6:6265 (talk) 12:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)