User talk:2A02:C7F:6E64:1C00:E404:13CE:A9CF:21CA

please explain why you have blocked me, and why the movie "10" is allowed on the disambiguation page for "Perfect 10". The movie in question is not titled "Perfect 10" anywhere in the world, so it should not be on that page. 2A02:C7F:6E64:1C00:E404:13CE:A9CF:21CA (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello. There was an edit war between you and another IP as to whether an entry for 10 (film) belongs on the DAB page at Perfect 10 (disambiguation). The range had to be blocked because of vandalism elsewhere. This particular edit is in a gray area, but you should discuss the change at Talk:Perfect 10 (disambiguation) after your block expires. If you are willing to create an account you won't be subject to the inconvenience of IP rangeblocks. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , please could you tell me where the "vandalism elsewhere" was so I can check if it was me. thank you! 2A02:C7F:6E64:1C00:E404:13CE:A9CF:21CA (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I can see from your reversions it's not me. Annoying! 2A02:C7F:6E64:1C00:E404:13CE:A9CF:21CA (talk) 21:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * But my question remains about why you reverted my edit. It was a good edit. The movie does not belong on that DAB page. At all. I mean, the word "perfect" isn't even used in the page's article ONCE. 2A02:C7F:6E64:1C00:E404:13CE:A9CF:21CA (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * For all the article edits from the /32, click on this link. You may notice that the majority of all the edits from that range in the last two days have now been undone by others, suggesting they were bad edits. You were edit warring at Perfect 10 (disambiguation) on 5 September so I'm not going to restore your version. You can negotiate that issue on the talk page after the block expires. If you are willing to create an account you don't have to wait for the rangeblock to expire, but you should still wait for consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 00:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)