User talk:2A02:CE0:2000:5B3C:3BDA:1DE4:339A:2DBF

February 2023
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Baphomet, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Baphomet, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 11:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adakiko (talk) 12:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Suggest reading the citations. Yours nor my opinion matters, Wikipedia goes by what wp:reliable sources state. Regarding our opinion, please see wp:no original research. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 12:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Baphomet. Adakiko (talk) 12:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 12:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)