User talk:2A02:F6D:8484:0:D0D6:F43:129D:F2D6

On quantum decoherence
Quantum decoherence will always occur and never at a fixed rate. Despite using error correction or rather quantum decoherence correction (QDC) the state of a qubit is always an analogue state, from which a logical state 0 or 1 is derived, much the same as RAM needs refresh to update it's present state away from the boundary when high. Since qubits are supposed to work analog with such QDC comes inherit chance for failure over time, since the QDC is never truly correct. The only option to avoid QDC is to use permanent state qubits, which by themselves never change their state, and obviously don't change due to any natural occuring radiation or fields. For the failure over time:

S1 = S2 + Qd + v

, where S1 is the state in time index 1,

, where S2 is the state it actually is in at time index 2,

, where Qd is the amount of correction applied in a linear fashion,

, where v is the variable that always differs in a minute amount even due to Heisenberg scale differences.

Repetition over time will result in accumulation of the sum of v's, leading to error, since the sum of v will dominate the outcomes.

Especially in repeating the same state and applying the same state correction, the sum of v will increase rapidly.

Regular computing never has this problem since it only has to preserve the logical state to 0 or (-)1, in which only the high state needs such maintainance. With quantum computing the state is analog and can't be preserved as well, since even small changes change outcomes over time due to accruement (stacking v's or sum v's.). Quantum computing in a non error operating fashion can be achieved through single processors qubits, in which a 256 bit or higher accumulator stores the state of the qubit, and the size of the processor is really small, and can therefore be stored many millions of times on the same die, making the first true quantum processor a possibility. And with that I mean a qubit processor with zero QDC, and only fallible after long times of failing to meet the analog standard of quantum computing.

This way of implementing qubit processing is free to use, but barred from patenting of any kind, and may improve computing for the world, as per expressed permission of the author.

(I'd like to see the first model to have the letter Z in it's naming though, cool)

Note: Any computing will always differ from RL, from anything irrelevant to relevant deviations over given time, in spite of the correctness in computation.