User talk:2A04:4540:906:9000:3492:F86F:82DD:CF6A

=Requested communication=

After taking a look at how Wikipedia seems to usually handle these things - in this case this isn't how you get someone to communicate, this is how you silence someone.

Giving notice, as the ANI page says in red letters, would have been appreciated.

Heavy handed accusations don't help either. Especially if they are wrong. I would go as far as mumbling about the complaining editor acting in bad faith.

The reverted edits to the VEA article had removed sources and content with no valid explanation: 1 As a non tool assisted editor the quickest way to restore the article was to revert everything. The next three edits removed the disputed double dates partially. This should show that editing was done in good faith.

The VME article did not have the disputed content restored after removal in November 2018.

No ownership was claimed. Don't understand how that accusation came about.

A /45 range block is extreme for what is ultimately a simple dispute. As is the block duration.

Regards, 2A04:4540:906:9000:3492:F86F:82DD:CF6A (talk) 18:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

CC: Bbb23