User talk:2A04:4A43:437F:CDDD:C5A3:5216:4A8E:35EF

February 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Islam in Europe, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I already explained to you that the website that you linked (www.8thcentury.com) is NOT an academic or reliable source, and the academic references cited in the article mention 719 as the year of the Andalusian invasion, not 720. Please stop. GenoV84 (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Islam in Europe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
 * The sources you are including do not meet reliable sourcing criteria. Take your argument to the talk page and get consensus for your changes or you will likely find yourself blocked from editing.-- Ponyo bons mots 22:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)