User talk:2A0A:A546:C628:1:D12E:C06F:9097:2B7F

November 2021
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to List of breakout characters, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Wat… The previous statement is uncited too! Besides, correctness does not follow from citation. That is a literal logical fallacy. Wikipedia even has an article about that! So expecting citations would literally be cognitive dissonance. Correctness follows from formally valid logical argument chains, based on statistically significant, verifiable (and personally(!) verified) observations (e.g. measurements). Aka only original research can ever be correct. … Remember that Wikipedia demands assuming good intentions. Aside from the very obvious factual correctness, due to what I wrote about being femsploitation by definition. Or do you have another definition of the term, that doesn’t include this case? If so, then I would like to hear and verify it… — 2A0A:A546:C628:1:D12E:C06F:9097:2B7F (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)