User talk:2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9

Welcome!

 * Hello, I am Using the source given to me, please don’t get mad at me as I am just trying to help this platform out 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 (talk) 17:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 I do not wish to enter into an edit war, so I encourage you to respond here - What source do you mean. The edits which are being reverted have no citation in them. This is where a source belongs. Danners430 (talk) 17:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The source is the one that is used already, I was scrolling and checked the source and the 2 I am changing said “scrapped” and I remember last time I checked them it didn’t say that, so I can understand you 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 (talk) 17:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I repeat - which source... because as of right now, those edits as far as the average user (which includes me right now) can tell, there is no source for those changes. There's no inline citation on any of those items leading to any source. Danners430 (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * these 2, the Sleeper first http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=1180 and http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=1184 Sorry if you can’t click them btw but it is cs.rhrp (the source) 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 (talk) 17:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Now we're getting somewhere - and the next question is, why are they not cited on the lines being changed, marking the carriages as scrapped? How is a user to know to look for those specific citations? Danners430 (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I can update the links on the mk1 page, I will go and do it right now, any comments might not be answered till i finish on that 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok I did the links saying exp br 2110 mk1 sleeper first built 1960, scrapped 2023 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I seemed mean by the way 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 (talk) 17:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If I seemed mean it’s because I haven’t done many edits 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9 (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Redrose64 Just to make you aware of this discussion, re British Railways Mark 1 - Danners430 (talk) 13:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:911F:CFE5:80BC:90E9, I'm making this formal: Information.svg Hello, I'm Redrose64. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Railways Mark 1, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn’t check here beforehand but the references did change I noticed but here are the references http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=1184 and http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=1180, thank you for the criticism though 2A0A:EF40:86F:8601:1F6:F494:2745:A52D (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That does not satisfy the policy on verifiability. I suggest that you read Help:Referencing for beginners. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)