User talk:2A0E:CB01:49:B700:A3E9:E5AB:A5D7:4891

July 2024
Hello, I'm Tony Holkham. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Royal National Lifeboat Institution, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not persist with this; it is not what Wikipedia is for  Tony Holkham   (Talk)  11:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Please advice on references. In the past have used references from right of centre publications that have not been acceptable (it seems unless it is The Guardian or BBC you do not want to accept them). The narrative presented aligns with the reality of what the RNLI are complicit in. You may not like it but Wikipedia should also present the reality of what this organisation is actually doing. I have references from GB News, Express, Daily Mail, Migration Watch but you will not accept these because they are not left wing press. 2A0E:CB01:49:B700:A3E9:E5AB:A5D7:4891 (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * It's perfectly reasonable to want to discuss what should go in an article, and that should take place on the article's talk page here, where you can start a new section, list your references, and other editors can join the discussion. Be aware, though, that whatever you think should be the case, Wikipedia is not for voicing opinions, only facts.  Tony Holkham   (Talk)  11:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)