User talk:2QW4

..

December 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vlachs of Serbia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 15:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Vlachs of Serbia a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ruby Murray. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Harghita County without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ruby  Murray  15:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Harghita County with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Josh3580 talk/hist 07:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

A reference problem
Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names.

Here you added a new reference   but didn't define it. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. " Cite error: The named reference  was invoked but never defined (see the help page). " Can you take a look and work out what you were trying to do? Thanks -- Frze > talk  07:52, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

vandalism
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sovata. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit war on Demographics history of Harghita County
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Demographics history of Harghita County. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit war on Covasna County
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Covasna County. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Recent edits to Treaty of Trianon
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! It was made the sentence grammatically incorrect Soham 14:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The treaty left defeated Hungary.... does the sentence sounds grammatically correct? Soham 14:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It would sound correct if it had been "The treaty left a defeated Hungary with..." not the above. Actually if you wanted the inclusion of the word defeated it would have required an accompanying article i.e. a. Soham 14:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Let us using it as you propose. 2QW4 (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure why not. Soham 14:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. Soham 14:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support! 2QW4 (talk) 14:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Ask me at my talk if you ever have a problem. Soham 14:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)