User talk:2nd ABG

Welcome!
Hello, 2nd ABG, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Shockoe Hill African Burying Ground.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shockoe Hill African Burying Ground.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Shockoe Hill African Burying Ground.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.richmondcemeteries.org/potters-field/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Shockoe Hill African Burying Ground Historic Highway Marker.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Shockoe Hill African Burying Ground Historic Highway Marker.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ✗ plicit  12:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:2nd ABG/Historic African and African American Burial Grounds in Richmond, Virginia


Hello, 2nd ABG. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Historic African and African American Burial Grounds in Richmond, Virginia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! –  City Urbanism  🗩   🖉  10:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You may delete this draft. 2nd ABG (talk) 11:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm Pi.1415926535. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Richmond Main Street Station seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, the information that was being added to the Richmond Main Street Station is both true and relevant. Telling half of the story and leaving the other half out does not seem neutral, but also has the appearance of being biased. All of the information that was being added to the article was supported with proof in the form of references and direct external links to the information. Published letters from the Federal Railroad Administration and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, along with an approved National Register Nomination were included, along with newspaper and other articles. The full story should be told, not part of it. It is a fact that the original tracks that were constructed by the Seaboard Airline in 1900, that run directly to Main Street Station were constructed on one of the largest African Burial Grounds in the country. It is also a fact that the DC2RVA high-speed rail project (as currently planned) will cause adverse effects to this same burial ground. Yet the 2017 report mentioned in the article minimized the burial ground, declared it not in their project area, and stated that there would be no adverse effect. This was not true. The work proposed to add additional train service to the Main Street Station will cause more harm to this burial ground.  This has now been recognized by the Federal Railroad Administration and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. Section 106 for the DC2RVA high-speed rail project was recently reopened because of these now recognized adverse effects.
 * I do not believe adding truthful information to an article is biased. The new information I contributed should not have been deleted. To suggest rewording is one thing, but to just remove the information from the article is not right. The information should be restored to the article, and more appropriate measures taken if you continue to disagree with the information. See below:


 * Wikipedia: Neutral point of view/FAQ
 * Lack of neutrality as an excuse to delete[edit source]
 * Shortcut
 * WP:POVDELETION
 * The NPOV policy is used sometimes as an excuse to delete texts that are perceived as biased. Isn't this a problem?
 * Editors have different ideas about how Wikipedia should look "today". Some want it to be as fault-free as possible, even if that means cutting mediocre content; others think that all but the most serious flaws should be allowed to stand so they can be improved.
 * While the burden of establishing verifiability and reliability rests on those who are challenged about it, there is usually no need to immediately delete text that can instead be rewritten as necessary over time. Obvious exceptions are articles about living people or clear vandalism, but generally there is no need for text to meet the highest standards of neutrality today if there's a reasonable chance of getting there.
 * Also, determining whether a claim is true or useful, particularly when few people know about the topic, often requires a more involved process to get the opinions of other editors. It's a good idea to raise objections on a talk page or at a relevant WikiProject. Discussing contentious claims helps editors to evaluate their accuracy and often leads to better sourcing and clearer phrasing.
 * Especially contentious text can be removed to the talk page if necessary, but only as a last resort, and never just deleted.
 * It is a frequent misunderstanding of the NPOV policy, often expressed by newbies, visitors, and outside critics, that articles must not contain any form of bias, hence their efforts to remove statements they perceive as biased. The NPOV policy does forbid the inclusion of editorial bias, but does not forbid properly sourced bias. Without the inclusion and documentation of bias in the real world, many of our articles would fail to document the sum total of human knowledge, and would be rather "blah" reading, devoid of much meaningful and interesting content. 2nd ABG (talk) 12:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)