User talk:3.14159265358pi

Welcome to 3.14159265358pi's talk page. You can do anything you want, but some restrictions apply. Remember the rules:


 * 1) Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.
 * 2) This is a talk page, not an article. So DO NOT post information such as what mercury is or the number 9 on this page. However, you CAN post information about editing on this page, but ONLY if you are talking to me.

November 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 7-cube. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 02:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Wrong!
Well, why do you write beryllium-10 as Be-10, not 10Be, like how it should? For doing that, you get this:


 * 1) EFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEF
 * 2) AAAAAAAAA!
 * =[|) SPLAT!
 * 1) SHUSH!
 * 1) SHUSH!

There "U" go! >:( 3.14159265358pi (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Writing elements as symbols with the mass number after may not be approved by IUPAC today, but it's extremely common since it was once the standard. I fail to see why you can write beryllium-10 or uranium-238, but are forbidden to write Be-10 or U-238. That's just stupid. I don't know when it stopped historically. For example, here's a 1956 paper with "U-235" in the title in Physical Review, by Richard Feynman. . That's a pretty prestigious author and journal. S  B Harris 02:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there 3.14159265358pi, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:3.14159265358pi.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Kinda late to the party
Not much point on a four-year old discussion. :)  howcheng  {chat} 18:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Redirecting your talk page
Please do not redirect your talk page. It is here to allow people to easily communicate with you. If you do not like your username and wish to edit under another, please see WP:CHU. If your username is changed, your talk page will exist at the new name. If you have questions about this, you're welcome to come by my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:20, 26 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Please also note that you must sign any talkpage comments with ~ .  Cheers  ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 15:22, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Template:Infobox neon

 * I have reverted you with a summary "here are many radioisotopes of Ne (Isotopes of neon) selecting one, with ???, doesn't seem fair" referring to Isotopes of neon. Would you please explain your revert? Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * How do you know it was Ne-20? Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Please explain and this. Materialscientist (talk) 02:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Stop editing and do explain this. Materialscientist (talk) 02:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The main things you seem to be doing here are edit-warring and adding unsourced and disputed information. These are both prohibited behaviors. This is your final warning. Your edit privileges here will be revoked if you do this again. DMacks (talk) 18:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Cesium moves
Hi there. What's up with the Cesium page moves? 28bytes (talk) 21:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh dear, I see what you're trying to do now. Bad idea. I'm going to have to revert this and clean up the mess. Please don't make any further changes in the meantime. 28bytes (talk) 21:48, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * That's a bold move to make without having first read the long TALK page argument about it. . Do you run the rest of your life that way? You must have a high pain tolerance. S  B Harris 21:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Any more disruptive page moves and you will be blocked from editing. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Aw, man! --3.14159265358pi (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for long-term pattern of many types of problematic behavior after many warnings ( pushed it over the top). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 04:11, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Nuclide-stub
Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. SeveroTC 13:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File talk:12-cube.svg


A tag has been placed on File talk:12-cube.svg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. → Σ  τ  c. 21:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

In a recent edit to the page N-dimensional sequential move puzzle, you changed one or more words from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 03:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I saw your contested deletion message for the above page. I would like to let you know that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; users on it are expected to very serious at all times. If you haven't already, please take a look at WP:PLAINSIMPLE and if you have any other questions, don't hesitate to use my talk page. Best wishes, → Σ  τ  c . 03:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

You're headed for another block, and it will likely be very long or perhaps indefinite. Wikipedia is a place for mature discussion and improvement of the encyclopedia. It is not for posting gibberish. While we welcome younger contributors who wish to contribute productively, we do not welcome anyone who does not behave productively. I recommend you read Guidance for younger editors to help you decide if this is a site you wish to be editing. DMacks (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry. --99.68.220.64 (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Note
Okay. By now, you've probably noticed that your userpage has disappeared. This is for your own good. I know it's very frustrating, and you had a lovely collection of images, but believe me: it really is for your own good, because it had information on it that could have been dangerous for you. You can read this page to learn more.

While I have your attention, I'd also like you to read this essay. It may help you avoid being blocked indefinitely. DS (talk) 02:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Extended periodic table with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Redlinked junk


A tag has been placed on Redlinked junk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S M S  Talk 14:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Talk-page
Template:Talk-page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. S M S  Talk 14:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Signature
Hello! The template you created for using it as your signature is forbidden. So I will advise you to put it up for deletion and use your own signature. If you want to cuztomize your signature go to My preferences and edit the present one in the text box. If you want any help in this regard feel free to contact me. Happy Editing! -- S M S  Talk 15:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Talk-page


A tag has been placed on Template:Talk-page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. S M S  Talk 15:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Signature template
I've moved your signature template to User:3.14159265358pi/sig since they should not be put in template space. Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Portal/Proposals, you may be blocked from editing. --Dэя-Бøяg 16:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Invalid article names, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:User-talk


A tag has been placed on Template:User-talk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dэя-Бøяg 17:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Uncyclopedia


A tag has been placed on Portal:Uncyclopedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dэя-Бøяg 17:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for more of the same unconstructive editing that led to your last block. Please try to edit more constructively, or you will be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:N things not to write your article about, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Dэя-Бøяg 18:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * But I was not actually vandalizing. And I didn't do it, anyway (or maybe I did). --3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 22:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Declines AfC submission
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!


 * For future reference, know that Wikipedia has a VERY high standard for humour (random gibberish is a little less than zero).
 * And please try to be serious on this site. We're trying to build an encyclopedia, right? → Σ  τ  c . 00:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Isotopes of bromine
I've reverted your removal of 66Br from Isotopes of bromine, which you had commented as "66Br is unknown". I'm no chemistry expert, but there appear to be sources out that that refer to it - even if its mass and half life might be unknown, we'd need some discussion on the Talk page to accept your apparent assertion that it doesn't actually exist -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Try looking at Nudat 2.6. Here's what you may see, centered on 67Br:

You don't see a 66Br. The lightest known isotope of bromine is 67Br. --3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 00:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

98Br
Of course, 98Br is known to science. But because of your revert, no reader will even know it exists. See Nudat 2.6 to clearly see that it exists. Here's what you may see, centered on 97Br:

You can see a 98Br just to the right to the focus point (97Br), can you? You see, 98Br is a low-yield fission product of 235U and 252Cf, so that's why it exists.

--3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 01:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Not sure who you're talking to on this one, but I haven't made any changes regarding 98Br - this is my only change. And looking back on the history, I can't see any recent version that included 98Br. But I will check the 66Br one a bit later - I did find sources that claim it exists, and I'll have to try to find them again (but all I really meant was to suggest it would be better to discuss it before removing it) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Anyway, the source for the 66Br is likely a hoax. --3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 12:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I found a couple of mentions$undefined$ pablo 14:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that shows a Talk page discussion is indeed needed, so people can evaluate the sources and a consensus can be achieved -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The color "kickass"


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The color "kickass", to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 28bytes (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

This is not Uncyclopedia. If you cannot restrain yourself from creating obvious hoax/joke pages, you will not be allowed to continue editing here. 28bytes (talk) 00:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I can hardly believe you. You have many warnings and block notices plastered on this page, and at the top you even have a link to WP:NOT, under the title "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia", yet you still continue to treat it like it isn't. I know you're younger than many of the editors here. Read the entirety of WP:COMPETENCE and WP:YOUNG if you want to continue editing, because I think your next block will be indefinite. → Σ  τ  c . 02:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

But it's supposed to be funny!!!!! --3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 02:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Then tell me, who on this talk page is laughing? Who on this talk page has awarded you for your excellence at humour? All you have received are warnings and blocks. Perhaps it's hinting that you're trying to be funny in the wrong place? → Σ  τ  c . 02:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Let me give you a further warning, 3.14159265358pi. While you are blocked, you can use this Talk page for one thing only - for acting in a sensible manner to try to get your block lifted. That means convincing us that you understand why you were blocked, and also that you will stop the childish behaviour that got you blocked. Any more of this "But it's supposed to be funny!!!!!" nonsense and you will lose your Talk page access for the duration of the block. Also, if you continue to make it look like you are too immature to edit here, you will be blocked indefinitely and told to go away and come back when you're older. I do hope you are listening and understanding this, because I really don't want it to come to that. But Wikipedia is a serious endeavour and not a place for kids to have a laugh - if you want to do "funny", then you will have to go find somewhere else to do it, as it is not wanted here. I do hope that is clear. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Like Uncyclopedia? --3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 03:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

So, the deletion log says the page was a blatant hoax. Could you list the hoaxes that were on the page? Also, if there were other criteria (such as patent nonsense, could you point out that, too? --3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 12:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 03:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * After your latest block and your responses to it, it's quite clear that nothing is getting through to you. It is also clear that if none of your warnings and blocks have had any effect, just waiting another week won't make any difference either. So I have upped your block to indefinite. That's not the same as infinite - it just means there is no specific time when you will be returning to editing, but that you will not be unblocked until you can convince us that you are mature enough to contribute sensibly and are committed to helping us build an encyclopedia without any silly nonsense -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 03:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

On the German Wikipedia, a common block reason is "No discernible intent for encyclopedic collaboration". If you can find an admis sympathetic enough to be willing to unblock you, I suggest you familiarize yourself with the terms laid out at 2nd chance. → Σ  τ  c. 03:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Since I blocked you earlier today, I cannot decline your unblock request, but I'd like to point out that you don't need to be unblocked here in order to contribute to Uncyclopedia. 28bytes (talk) 03:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Which is not what I meant. --3.14159265358pi Have a discussion here 12:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * For continued misuse of this Talk page (specifically your tendentious last comment immediately prior to this section, arguing about the article you rightly had deleted) I have revoked your Talk page access. Have some time off, go get your fill of juvenile silliness elsewhere, then come back when you think your maturity has sufficiently improved to be able to work on this serious encyclopedia project. If you email me in no less than six months and make it clear that you understand how to work here, I will restore your access again so that you can make another unblock request. Any other admin who believes you are ready can, of course, restore it according to their own terms. Alternatively, if you wish, you can contact WP:BASC to contest your block. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)