User talk:303ald

File:Maria.S.RGChamp.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maria.S.RGChamp.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Courcelles 04:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Maria.S.RGChamp.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Maria.S.RGChamp.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GermanJoe (talk) 11:43, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Maria Sharapova
Hi. I just wanted to explain why I have reverted your edits on the Maria Sharapova article. This was for a number of reasons.

Much of what you added was not neutrally phrased. For instance, you changed the 2003 heading to "2003: Rising star". This is a bit too much offering the opinion that she was a rising star in 2003. You also said she "showed great promise again" in 2014. This is again voicing an opinion.

You also add unsourced original research such as that her "preferred surfaces have completely changed". Is this your analysis?

Lastly you added a number of observations about what "many commentators" and "many critics" believed. These are what we call on Wikipedia weasel phrases, because its not specified who believes these things and no cite is offered to back them up. The suspicion in therefore that this are actually the opinions of the editor, rather than anyone else.

Please feel free to repeat your edits if you can avoid these issues. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 18:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)