User talk:31.121.4.10

May 2022
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  23:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am writing to query your 'british' claim to this tournament. There are 4 major tournaments in golf. The Open, The US Open, The US PGA and The Masters. Any credible website or media outlet does not refer to this tournament as british. Not even social media sites.... please see link to the official site where there is no mention of the name you are suggesting.... https://www.theopen.com/ perhaps you are getting confused with the british masters or indeed the womens british open? 31.121.4.10 (talk) 18:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at The Open Championship shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit (Talk) 09:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. pʰeːnuːmuː →‎  pʰiːnyːmyː  → ‎ ɸinimi  → ‎ fiɲimi  03:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (The Open Championship) for a period of two weeks for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Since you're immediately returned to this behavior, I've extended the block another month, and will continue to extend it in the future if necessary. And if you make another edit like this, I will convert the block to sitewide; please see Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 04:11, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Roy L. Dennis, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 17:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * please review 'tribs. Thanx, -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 17:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Block converted to sitewide. Thanks for the ping. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 21:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)