User talk:31.5.165.140

July 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 1st Guards Tank Regiment. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they)   ( talk ) 19:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Excuse me, but that doesn't fit into "personal commentary", due to its objectivity. Everything said is based on data and leads to a more cohesive article and a better understanding of the subject for the readers. 31.5.165.140 (talk) 12:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at T-90, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove content that is properly referenced by unsourced or poorly sourced content. Annh07 (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at T-90. Annh07 (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at T-90 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Annh07 (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Discuss removal of content
1. Tweets are usually unacceptable as sources. Please review WP:UGC.

2. Avoid stating opinions as facts. Please review WP:YESPOV.

You provide the source of a video and give your subjective comments through the images in it is against wiki guidelines.

I reverted your last edit. If you feel that the information you have provided is useful for changing the content of the article, please create a new topic on the article's talk page and provide information and cite reliable sources to the editors participate in the discussion. Please do not modify any information in the article until the discussion is over. Annh07 (talk) 21:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2023
Hello, I'm Macaddct1984. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Islam in Russia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 12:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 125 mm smoothbore ammunition, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)