User talk:31.51.79.213

September 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at SAR supergroup, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Mr Fink (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Proteobacteria. --Mr Fink (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Embryophyte. --Mr Fink (talk) 16:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 17:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Nick Moyes. I noticed that you recently removed content from Medusozoa without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''As stated in my edit summary, removal of cited content probably merits discussion on the talk page. As this follows a recent block for disruptive editing, please be careful of further edits you make, explaining them via the edit summary box '' Nick Moyes (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  PATH SLOPU (Talk) 12:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, look, you seem to be trying to do something to zoology articles with some goal or purpose in mind, which is likely to be a good and constructive thing. However, you have so far not communicated this goal to any other editors, and you have accordingly been warned and indeed blocked for what we must call quite a disruptive pattern of editing.


 * You now have, I think, three courses of action.


 * 1) Give up on Wikipedia, people don't let you do what you want. No doubt you'll find somewhere else to express your opinions.


 * 2) Go on trying to force through your personal point of view without discussion. You will be reverted each time, then blocked, and eventually permanently banned from Wikipedia.


 * 3) Explain on a talk page what you are trying to do, and why; name the scientific sources (books, journal papers) you are relying on for these changes; obtain consensus from other editors; and go ahead together to improve the encyclopedia.


 * I'd say it was plain which of these would be most constructive, and most likely to succeed. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)