User talk:32.211.201.248

Hello, I'm Tedickey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. TEDickey (talk) 21:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

"Not constructive?" That is not saying anything. What is NOT true about the changes made? This is the problem with a site like this, you have some who want propaganda leaning toward THEIR world, while people who are actually here want to tell it from our perspective. Who is right - someone here or someone far away in Boston?

March 2020
Your recent editing history at Connecticut shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aasim 17:29, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Is this the talk section?
Why do I have to fight to make the RIGHT corrections on this article? I know the person who made it this way is from somewhere in the Boston area, as only they want to emphasize their region for CT. CT is in metro NYC - the largest in the USA. CT is not in metro Boston, and New England is NOT a market, metro area or government! The Coronavirus event should be enough to let you know that this is metro NYC and we have NOTHING to do with BOSTON! Boston sports teams are NOT local to ANY part of CT and they are not allowed to market in CT because this is not their territory.

The person who edits this article puts RI and MA as CT's borders BEFORE NY, and they put New England before NYC metro area, which they put as an afterthought, and in a way that makes it look as a fallacy. The reality is the reverse, as the ONLY connection with those states is this New England title, which really has no meaning. NY borders MOST of CT in FIVE directions! I know, because I am constantly straddling the border and going into nearby NJ. We in this Tri-state area hardly travel to the MA/RI regions. RI and MA only have one border each for CT. They should not be listed first. This article (as usual over the years...) is written in a way to pull CT away from NYC (only 10 minutes away) and to try and attach it to Boston (3 HOURS away), which means that this article is propaganda and not the truth.

I also work with local governments, and they ALWAYS view their politics from a NYC region point of view, never New England or Boston. Not only are we dealing with proximity, we are dealing with the largest market in the nation vs a market that we are not even a part of! Only people in the Boston sectors find this to be a problem. I think if the New England title were to drop from CT, then that would take away any debates on the matter. The state of CT is only in the NYC market and the Hartford market, so any other state is dismissed. So let's have this article reflect reality!

NY/NJ/CT Local News Channel

[http://www.news12.com More Local Tri-state news. No Boston, they have their own]

http://www.mta.info/mnr