User talk:32.212.171.148

March 2019
Hello, I'm Thegooduser. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Thegooduser  Life Begins With a Smile :)  🍁 21:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Hello, I'm Hamtechperson. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to United States Attorney General— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Ham tech  person  00:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at United States Attorney General, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas Westerlaken (talk) 21:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Uranium One. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 19:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nunes memo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nunes memo was changed by 32.212.171.148 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975146 on 2019-10-26T15:01:27+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nunes memo. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Racial views of Donald Trump has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Racial views of Donald Trump was changed by 32.212.171.148 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879283 on 2019-12-20T14:49:39+00:00

Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Climatic Research Unit email controversy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [ trigger the edit filter], you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 21:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)