User talk:32.218.44.25

March 2016
Hello, I'm Quinto Simmaco. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User Talk:Orangemike that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Just a general notice, in the interest of civility. While you're free to voice your opinion, what you said does technically qualify as a personal attack. Hence the other editor reverting you, even though refactoring a comment is not usually kosher. In this case, it's warranted... If you want it to remain, just make it a bit more civil. Edit-warring to restore it (as is) isn't helping. Whatever the issue is, talk it out, and de-escalate. Or take it to the appropriate notice board if you feel it's necessary. '' Quinto Simmaco (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * It was a relatively mild personal attack, but it was an escalation, and it crosses into pure harassment when you restore it eight times and when you accuse those who disagree with you of vandalism. Furthermore, a cursory check of the Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting article would show that the assertion was made and is amply supported by sourcing which you could have added. We have a continuing problem with aggressive whitewashing of racially-motivated violence on Wikipedia, and justifiably treat such removals with great suspicion.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)