User talk:32.218.46.10

On January 27, 2016 important source material about James Reiss's work was deleted from JAMES REISS. Four reviews of Reiss's books were deleted, along with three poems originally printed in The Atlantic, The New Yorker, and Slate. Some material about Reiss's personal life was also removed from the article. Under External Links some important source material is still in evidence. Without the deleted material the article may look more like a resume than it should. Stripped of four secondary sources--the deleted book reviews of his work--Reiss's notability may appear to be diminished. Why not restore the deleted source material?

Is the scrutiny you paid to Reiss on January 27, 2016 related to his attempt, on January 26 and 27, 2016, to add material to Wikipedia's article on Thorstein Veblen?

I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks for your consideration. Reissja (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)