User talk:322Q4K

The information that you added to the Bacula page is inaccurate as has been confirmed by Maik Aussendorf. Your edits also modified a section that had previously been in dispute and which was "resolved" by several months of RFC where various editors gave their opinions. The text finally chosen, by me, to resolve the dispute, was the best I could come up with that summaries *all* the comments. Your edits bring the disputed pages back to the beginning of the dispute. In addition, some of the material you reverted duplicates information that is already there and which was added by another editor after your initial edit. I request you to revert the last revert you made to remove the inaccurate information and duplicated text. If you have some other ideas of information to supply, you are welcome to discuss it on the Bacula talk page. However, please remember, the Bacula page is about Bacula not about Bareos. If you want to write about Bareos or present Bareos' point of view please do so as has been suggested on the talk page by creating a Bareos page. KernSibbald (talk) 04:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Reply
Kern, I would appreciate seeing where, aside from the Bacula page, Bacula website, or your blog, the Bareos fork is ever referred to as "hostile." I don't consider the project author to be a credible source of unbiased information.

I'm not going to get into an edit war with you over this. I have stated on that I have no affiliation with either Maik or Bareos, nor am I in any way associated with Bacula. I don't use your software, and after seeing how you and Maik conduct yourselves, I don't think I ever want to. You guys ruin the spirit of open source.

Your accusation that I've previously edited the page from an anonymous IP address is without basis, and completely false. I registered a Wikipedia account expressly so I could edit the page without appearing anonymous.

I'm not going to try and fight your censorship of Bacula to paint a positive picture. What you're doing on the Bacula page is PR, pure and simple. Fine, if you want Wikipedia to be your own personal PR platform, I'm not going to stop you. I think you're making Wikipedia a worse place by placing biased information here, but clearly you have friends who agree with you, and I don't, so I'm leaving. 322Q4K (talk) 23:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)