User talk:333-blue/Archives 2


 * In zhwiki, I have been blocked from editing because of WP:AFD (notablity nominations).--333-blue 01:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I’m sorry about that,I hope you can enjoy editing on English Wikipedia.--Chinyen Lu (talk) 01:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * OK! Just remember to space after "comma".--333-blue 03:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

User talk:100hectares
You asked for page protection here, and for several others, but the user was blocked after their last edit, which, by the way, was ages ago. Could you please explain? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2015 WTA 125K series tournaments
Template:2015 WTA 125K series tournaments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William 13:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:Tennis events 4 merge
I undid your edit to this template because it was closed as a merge, not a redirect. I explained that the merge is not finished in the edit summary. I see you reverted me, again, but as is, the pages 2000 ATP Tour World Championships – Doubles and 2000 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles are messed up. I'll try to finish the merge of this template, first, and fix it, but it should be as it was until then. —PC-XT+ 04:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:Tennis events 4 to Template:Tennis events 2, Template:Tennis events 3 to Template:Tennis events, they look like the same.--333-blue 05:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * They are nearly the same, but there are some differences that need to be merged. You can compare with the sandboxed and live version on Template:Tennis events/testcases. #4 is nearly ready to merge, but also has similar differences from #2. (That page doesn't directly compare #4 and #2, but both to the same sandbox.) —PC-XT+ 05:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

2015 Australian Open – Women's Singles Qualifying
Why are you being disruptive? Again? "Q" is not a reason for a revert. Please explain thoroughly. The changes I made were to correct the order of the draw and to correct spellings, capital letters and remove a red-linked category. Your reverts just re-introduce the errors. Jared Preston (talk) 08:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

2015 Australian Open
In the seed table, entries for players who retired should say "retired vs [player]" not "retired to [player]". It is more correct linguistically, and, if you check articles for other Slams, you will see that this is how it is normally done. Please stop changing "vs" to "to" for players who retired from their matches. Tad Lincoln (talk) 08:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Categorizing User Pages
Hello,

Generally speaking, we don't categorize a person's user pages because they don't aid navigation. (Another editor has nominated Categories for discussion/Log/2015 January 20 for deletion because it is visible in the main encyclopedia. You may want to make sure you your drafts/notes linked before that nomination is concluded.  For more background, please see Categorization. Hope that helps!RevelationDirect (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi 333-blue, regarding this, see the message immediately above. The categories were deleted as a result of this discussion. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * But the bot deleted the user pages as well as the categories. Surely that's not the intended result of the CfD?  If there was an error with the CfD close or with Cydebot's implementation thereof, the user pages (but not the categories for them) should be speedily restored.  Eluchil404 (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Which user pages (non-categories) were deleted? Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I see them now—I've restored the ones you've listed at Deletion review/Log/2015 January 27—were there any others apart from those three? I'm not sure why that happened. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)