User talk:333kings

Welcome!

Hello, 333kings, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Cochlea
I see you're interested in the cochlea. I didn't understand some of your edits. I reverted the latest and rewrote some stuff, including some that you worked on and some that you didn't. Let's discuss if you don't understand or agree with what I did. You can respond here. Dicklyon (talk) 06:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * hi there. yes i am. just as a hobby updating this page to the best of my vocabulary. I studied this extensively for about a month for exams. Did you write some of those paragraphs? There were some good ones, but the reason I started editing this page was I didn't like the wording of the first original article on the cochlea and I believe since then, I, along with others and you(?) have improved this greatly. Did you write the original? Wondering what your area of expertise is on this topic too? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 333kings (talk • contribs)


 * I have written bits of it; you can check the history. I've been studying hearing for about 35 years.  You seem to think that emissions are through the round window; mostly they're just the reverse path of the input, via the oval window and ossicles.  Dicklyon (talk) 15:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Would you describe impedence matching as a phenomenon? or just part of the physiological process? thinking of chopping that first paragraph in 'detail' of function, and making most of it its own subheading Also can you explain how you think emissions are through round window? A travelling pressure will either dissipate or find an exit, where I have read in papers this exit is the oval window, and also the scala vestibuli travelling wave is in exact opposite phase to that of the original wave in the scala tympani.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

Barber pole
If you read it, please source it. WP:RS. WP:NOR. You have mistaken that we are looking for WP:truth, when in fact we are looking for WP:reliability and WP:verifiability. The burden is on you, as you are the proponent of the change. This is not personal, but it is a fundamental of how Wikipedia works. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 01:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Low threshold spikes.png
Thanks for uploading File:Low threshold spikes.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Low threshold spikes.png needs authorship information.
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Low threshold spikes.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)