User talk:34002salisbury

Welcome to Wikipedia
--4wajzkd02 (talk) 12:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Warnings
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bob, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bob was changed by 34002salisbury (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-11-10T12:17:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:18, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Judging from the nonsensical nature of the edits coming from this account today, I suspect that it may have become compromised. Nick-D (talk) 11:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * On 28 June 2012 this account made 13 edits in the space of 14 minutes. Are you the person who made those edits? A straight yes or no, please.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Probably not, it was over 4 years ago and I was 15 at the time.


 * , this seems like a fairly low-risk unblock to me, and honestly I can't see much of a reason for someone to have compromised this account and be trying to reactivate it most of a decade later. I'm willing to unblock, any objections? GeneralNotability (talk) 14:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I wonder if it would be better to allow account creation instead so they can create a new account and start fresh, but you're probably right that it's low risk. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:COMPROMISED allows admins to unblock compromised accounts if they're comfortable that this risk has been addressed. I agree that this seems very low risk, and have unblocked. many thanks for the ping and  many thanks for your advice as well. 34002salisbury, best wishes for your future editing. Nick-D (talk) 23:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)