User talk:35.1.193.73

I thought this was a well-written article. I liked that the information was heavily rooted in fact, and enjoyed the initiative taken in the author's assessment of not only the data patterns but also of data collection modes within the government. I could not detect any particular bias, which aided in making the article clear and informative. The inclusion of the crowd-sourced projects component is topical and interesting-- it taps into the current mobilization of ordinary citizens to combat fatal encounters with law enforcement. I wish the racial component had been discussed in a little more detail but all in all this was a very informative, well-executed article that I enjoyed reading. Sophscar (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)