User talk:35.136.168.227

October 2018
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Weinstein effect— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ralph Breaks the Internet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ralph Breaks the Internet was changed by 35.136.168.227 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97472 on 2018-11-03T04:47:26+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rich Moore. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on God Rest You Merry, Gentlemen. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 11:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ralph Breaks the Internet. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Classicwiki I knew I would get blocked but I did it anyway because you know why I don't deny that me vandalizing the page was wrong nor am I trying to make excuses but I did it because I was genuinely hurt about Rich Moore lying that he would included Mario in the sequel that was just unforgivable, nor will I ever forgive him for the stupid excuse on why he did not include Mario in the first movie. (It is in fact one of the reasons why I can't even fully enjoy the first movie) I wanted that movie to fail at least critically (That may sound petty but frankly I don't care) and to find out that's not the case made me even angrier since he does not deserve it for reasons I already mentioned. And those other reason why I vandalized Well I did those other edits (that had nothing to do with the previous reason) just for the heck of it. Ciao.

January 2019
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Paul Eiding— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 02:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mark Twain Prize for American Humor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

This behavior isn't new for you. There are edits like this in your history. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  05:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC) Well screw it I am not going to even bother I tried my best to explain why I why I wanted to be unblocked alright!? So screw off you jerk!!!