User talk:35.136.185.103

May 2019
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. El_C 04:05, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 15:14, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hades in popular culture. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JimVC3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Taxi Driver, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 23:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Doug Bowser, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 21:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Matilda (novel)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 23:47, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Adding your opinion into articles
Hello, I would just like to tell you that I had undone your edit at Star-Lord as it seemed to be an opinion. If you have any questions, just ask me on my talk page. Thanks! Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 02:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 02:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Your recent editing history at Stapes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 06:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read the above also in relation to your edit warring on Flypaper. If you continue to revert to your unsourced and non-neutral point of view you may be blocked from editing. Captainllama (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Chris Niosi. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Niosi. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chris Niosi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * I was not trying to vandalize the article for goodness sake I am sorry if it was vandalism however that was not my intent

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ralph Breaks the Internet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ralph Breaks the Internet, you may be blocked from editing. Sk8erPrince (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Ralph Breaks the Internet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. CLCStudent (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ralph Breaks the Internet. CLCStudent (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  caknuck ° needs to be running more often  19:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2019
Hello, I'm Aranya. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Coccyx, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Aranya (talk) 02:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chowder (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 01:27, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on 2010 Copiapó mining accident. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Aranya (talk) 03:50, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alex Trebek. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Babar te Elephant, you may be blocked from editing. Leschnei (talk) 01:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Babar
I am sorry that you feel strongly about an imaginary cartoon character marrying his imaginary cartoon cousin. It may be shocking to you, but cousin marriage is widely tolerated in this world, especially in royal families. Please produce a reliable secondary source documenting this element as true incest, or drop the stick, please. Elizium23 (talk) 03:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bird extinction. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ◢ ''   Ganbaruby!     (talk to me) 16:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Really? A wiki with a left wing bias and a bias for climate change is telling me this? How laughable but I will stop anyways for now at least if only for pragmatic reasons

Thylacine
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Thylacine. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:00, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ST47 (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 00:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)