User talk:35Ashwood

No tabloids? Yet you fail to remove the other newspaper reference. methinks you are what is known as power pissed

February 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at David Sharpe (football club chairman), without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 03:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at David Sharpe (football club chairman). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Egghead06 (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

A ban works both ways and requires reasonable action on both sides. Tabloid journalism is a style of writing and does not ascribe to any particular newspaper, merely the style of writing. One newspaper source is as unreliable as any other newspaper source. If you remove one newspaper citation for being unreliable, you must remove them all unless you believe that your newspaper sources are 'more reliable' than any other.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at David Sharpe (football club chairman). ''Please read again, or for the first time, WP:BLPSOURCES before you apply further disruptive editing. Thanks.'' Egghead06 (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

You are totally drunk on your power my good man.

The Independent is named as a tabloid in Wikipedia itself - a source you have repeatedly put back into the page. The other newspaper source is in tabloid format and contains information from unreliable sources.

I have not re-edited and included the comment's taken from the Daily Mail as per your direction. However, I have taken out those sources already included which fit your description as 'tabloid', and as being the reason why my edit should not be included.

As a matter of course, I will take this issue to a more senior editor.... simply because you are too thick to apply your own rules


 * Stop edit warring or you will be blocked. There are no "senior editors", but there are admin like myself that are charged by the community to block people if they are disruptive when editing.  If you want to argue about content, stop reverting and instead use the talk page on that article, David Sharpe (football club chairman).  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 17:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)