User talk:36.67.242.103

February 2020
Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Korean drama without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Get consensus on the article's talk page before doing this. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I see Marchrain13 & David Biddulph work together to cut List of highest-rated Korean dramas in cable television from 68 numbers t0 50 numbers. so whats wrong if i cut that from 50 to 10 like them did? they cut without make sense reason. cause i think 68 numbers list before is vaild with source and is above 5% rating all. sorry for bad english. is not appreciate all edit until now. in Korea, rating above 5% is a record so i think the list is good to be 68 numbers so readers can keep the information. i can use their reason like no need to be more than 10 too if they can do it. Thanks.
 * There's nothing wrong with doing it, but you should read WP:CONSENSUS - in short, go to the article talk page and discuss it with other editors before making that much of a change, so other editors can have an input. Your English is fine by the way! I think I understand what you want, I would go to Talk:Korean drama and say something like this, and that maybe top 10 is sufficient. Good luck, and again, welcome to Wikipedia. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Korean drama, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Marchrain13 do same too. always cut list from 68 to 50 without valid reason. so stubborn to always cut list. if he can do it, why i can do it like him?

the reason is No need above rank 50.. other people can say No need above rank 10 too.. but if want to still 50 in list, so this time i will say goodbye to contribute on that page. now i know all edit and cotribution until now not counted. good luck and thanks. i won;t edit again.