User talk:360coach

May 2013
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. CensoredBiscuit (talk) 05:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

360-degree feedback
Hello! :) I see you've reverted my edit on 360-degree feedback. Could you please tell me why? ~ Zirguezi 09:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Zirquezi. Thank you for asking. The edit was reverted for two reasons: 1) The 360 raters were not comprehensive. In other words, it didn't leave room for including raters such as direct reports, peers, and others, as is spelled out in the Wikipedia 360 article itself.  2) The categories or competencies used have not been proven to be those most important to 360 behaviours. They are subjective, and not based on research. If you do find research behind choosing these competencies, they should have a reference to support why they were used. 00:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Coaches360
 * 1. Maybe I don't understand it but in my opinion the image does show that. It has three lines where each line stand for a different reviewer.
 * 2. The competencies are based on this management book which used The Competency Library. You say that the competencies are subjective. Doesn't that mean that it is impossible to get a perfect list of competencies because everyone uses different ones?
 * I don't want to give you the impression that the image I added was perfect. However a simple image search on Google yields about the same results leading me to believe that it is representative of what is used.
 * If you have any feedback or an example image that you think would add to this article please let me know. Until them I think the image should be included in the article. Please let me know what you think. ~ Zirguezi 18:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)