User talk:36reasons

June 2009
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page West Kelowna worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you. SoxBot III (talk | owner) 18:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

West Kelowna
Please do not delete citations, they will only be re-placed and it's a nuisance to have to do so. Also please respect Canadian spelling rules in articles on Canadian subjects, and do not un-link items which are already blue-linked (or even if they're red linked). Please make constructive edits in future.Skookum1 (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If cited links are now dead links, then please replace them with or, with date,  .  Deleting them outright is not an option unless the cited bit has an indication that another citation must be found.  If the cite is still there but only old (which maybe is what you mean by "out of date") then it's still a citation.  Please do not de-link the Indian Reserves again, and please stop 'correcting" things to American spelling....Skookum1 (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, you should read WP:3RR and WP:Edit war before you continue to re-do the edits you've made so far.Skookum1 (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with West kelowna adopts new name
Hello. Concerning your contribution, West kelowna adopts new name, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, West kelowna adopts new name appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. West kelowna adopts new name has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)