User talk:37.130.248.34

November 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bebo with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

John Laing
Please do not add material to wikipedia which is copyright or has been lifted in whole or part from a company brochure. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright violation
This is a further polite request. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Laing plc, and it appears to include extensive material from http://www.laing.com/uploads/100th%20Investment_Final_PRINT_v2.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. Dormskirk (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Rutebega. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John Laing plc, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rutebega ( talk ) 23:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 37.130.248.34. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article John Laing plc, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Rutebega ( talk ) 23:25, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Rutebega. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to John Laing plc seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rutebega ( talk ) 23:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello 37.130.248.34, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rutebega ( talk ) 23:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at John Laing plc. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Rutebega ( talk ) 23:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Old Catholic Church has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Old Catholic Church was changed by 37.130.248.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9405 on 2013-04-29T16:23:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Old Catholic Church with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 16:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Old Catholic Church with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Yinta n  16:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Old Catholic Church.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:29, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Ander Herrera has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ander Herrera was changed by 37.130.248.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957031 on 2013-09-02T13:42:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ander Herrera with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  13:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Unibrow has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Unibrow was changed by 37.130.248.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873052 on 2014-03-17T19:07:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)