User talk:37.203.168.65

Apartment bombings
Your recent edit begs a question: how was it possible that no Chechens were accused of the bombings, while the bombings themselves were somehow linked to Chechnya? It's not immediately clear from the article. But, for example, this article by Lorenzo Vidino clears that ground, which is also covered by some other experts in terrorism. Hope that helps! --Document hippo (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bhad Bhabie—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  22:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Sarah Everard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Felida97 (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Sarah Everard, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Murder of Sarah Everard was changed by 37.203.168.65 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921335 on 2021-10-02T17:03:14+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to World Economic Forum have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: World Economic Forum was changed by 37.203.168.65 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867653 on 2021-10-04T20:34:44+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Extinction Rebellion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — bwDraco talk /contribs 21:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hindu deities—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Black conservatism in the United States—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  23:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to EastEnders. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — T ALK — C ONTRIBS  — 23:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. — Manti  core  23:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)