User talk:37.236.206.18

October 2023
Hello, I'm Catalyzzt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to De Wallen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Catalyzzt (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. signed, Willondon (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at De Wallen, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at De Wallen. - Arjayay (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at De Wallen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 15:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.