User talk:37.44.150.150

September 2018
Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alberta separatism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 21:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alberta separatism. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alberta separatism was changed by 37.44.150.150 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928349 on 2018-09-02T22:04:57+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alberta separatism, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Alberta separatism
Hello,

Please try and understand the difference between conservatism; which is an ideology and conservation which is an action and a noun ie. the act of conservatism. Your syntax is poor but, it is not helped by using words that are incorrect to your purpose.

"Both the Alberta government and the Canadian federal government responded politically to address oil reserves conservatism".

This sentence means oil reserves are conservative. ie. That oil reserves have a political ideology and that ideology is conservatism. Obviously that does not make sense since, oil reserves are not sentient and therefore can not have nor express preferences regarding political ideologies. Secondly, it implies that both Alberta and Canada addressed this conservatism somehow with the intention of modifying it! ie. to try and change the conservative nature and ideology of Alberta's oil reserves.

Secondly, Joe Clark did not take a minority government. One can not take government! One is appointed to Government by the Crown through winning an election. Therefore, while many verbs can indicate coming to office or a change of ministry to take is not one of them; elected, won, defeated the incumbent etc... all suffice but took is simply wrong especially since in this case it is not indicated who he took office from and so the sentence lacks an object ie. who he took the premiership from.

This stuff isn't easy and I can understand your frustration but, Wikipedia only works if people allow others to use their skills to better the article.

Regards.