User talk:37.6.132.166

December 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Oliver Stone, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''that is sourced. please don't remove it without first getting consensus on the talk page.''  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 14:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I gave a valid reason. The individual wherein has controversial views but to define him on this is journalistically wrong. He's a director, writer and documentarian. AND you mention his conspiratorial views later on, too, so it looks like wikipedia is bent on painting him on the corner as a conspiracy theorist no matter what. Its rather shameful and biased.37.6.132.166 (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The sources say he is a conspiracy theorist, so we say that he is. We summarize sources, not make our own conclusions based on what we think is true. Please discuss on the articles talk page if you wish to get consensus to remove it.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 14:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think I will. Its pretty sad that such an obvious distinction has to be made about a person who has repeatedly said that such a term is not a welcome moniker for his profession. He might be a provocateur, despite what he says about that, too, but one of the sources that label him as a conspiracy theorist involves Christopher Hitchins, who has always had a negative deposition towards Stone37.6.132.166 (talk) 14:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)