User talk:38.115.2.194

January 2019
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Henry Drinker, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  21:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Removing content entirely because it is (according to you) "factually inaccurate" is hardly an explanation when you don't say what specifically was inaccurate or in what respect. Nor did you attempt in good faith to revise the material to make it, in your view, more accurate. The content you removed is all cited to reliable sources, was carefully prefaced with such phrases as "according to critics," and was in fact an accurate rendition of what those qualified scholars have published. Although opinionated, that material fairly describes a significant current perspective on Drinker's work and times. Without it, the article is misleading in that it seems entirely laudatory, when in fact that position is a controversial point of view. Unless you can specify an inaccuracy (as contrasted with a disagreement with the opinion implied by that criticism), I believe the material should be restored. PDGPA (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)