User talk:38.122.61.11

April 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sandžak, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 20:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Lukewarmbeer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sandžak without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You will need to develop some consensus before making a major edit of this kind. That will require some evidence that the section you want to remove is indeed inaccurate. Thanks.'' Lukewarmbeer (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sandžak. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 20:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 22:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)