User talk:38.158.166.154

September 2023
Hello, I'm MrConorAE. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Camilla Belle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — MrConorAE (User &#124; Talk &#124; Contrib) 04:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Camilla Belle bad ref link
Hey, just saw your message at Wikipedia_talk:FAQ/Article_subjects — yep, that's a porn link. Sorry about the misunderstanding earlier. The domain in question appears to have been hijacked, as an archived version appears to be accurate to what it was cited for. I'll try to go through and see if it's used anywhere else.

However, please be aware that Wikipedia_talk:FAQ/Article_subjects is not the place to discuss issues with article content; you should have brought this up at Talk:Camilla Belle. Also, I'm unclear about why you attempted to solve this problem by removing categories from the article and replacing the problematic link with unrelated text; such edits, even if well-intentioned, can be difficult for other Wikipedia users to understand.

Box of wolves (feed) 06:20, 22 September 2023 (UTC)


 * And please don't link to external images on the talk page. We can't use them. Meters (talk) 07:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The domain was hijacked. The link has been fixed by marking it as status=usurped and adding an archive URL. Diff. Now the archive URL displays instead of the hijacked domain. – Novem Linguae (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)